PCI DSS v4.0.1, checked at the code level.
Zairen maps cardholder-data requirements straight to your codebase with static analysis, so obligations stay met between assessments instead of resurfacing at SAQ time.
Requirements mapped to your controls
PCI DSS v4.0.1 requirements - including access control (Requirement 8) and logging & monitoring (Requirement 10) - are mapped to the controls your codebase and tooling actually implement.
Static analysis for cardholder-data handling
Zairen's static analysis scans for how cardholder data is handled in code: where it's touched, how it's protected, and whether the implementation matches what the requirement expects.
SAQ-ready evidence
Evidence stays current continuously, so completing your Self-Assessment Questionnaire becomes a review of standing proof rather than a fresh evidence-gathering exercise.
AI-generated remediation
Failing requirements come with prioritized, plain-language remediation guidance your engineers can act on directly, tracked back to the requirement it satisfies.
Which PCI DSS version do you support?
PCI DSS v4.0.1, mapped through the same unified control library used for ISO 27001 and SOC 2.
Does this replace a QSA assessment?
No – Zairen keeps your evidence continuously ready so the QSA or SAQ process itself goes faster and surfaces fewer surprises.
Which PCI DSS requirements map to code?
Requirements that depend on implementation – Req 3 encryption, Req 6 secure development, Req 7/8 access control, Req 10 logging – can be traced directly to code-level evidence.
How does Zairen help with PCI DSS Requirement 8?
Zairen checks your identity provider and codebase for enforced multi-factor authentication and scoped access, then maps the result to Requirement 8 evidence. Read the PCI DSS v4.0.1 Requirement 8 MFA guide.
Can static analysis find cardholder-data gaps?
Yes. Zairen scans for cardholder-data flows, missing encryption, and unsafe handling patterns, then maps findings to the relevant PCI DSS requirements. See PCI DSS static analysis: cardholder-data gaps in code.